Redistricting and the Personal Vote: When Natural Experiments are Neither Natural nor Experiments
By Jasjeet S. Sekhon, R. Titiunik. 2009
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59a658ac7c82dfbdad85ae53816710ebbeddb937
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- I. Fazey
- M. Reed
- K. O’Brien
- Niko Schäpke
- P. Tschakert
- Arnim Wiek
- G. Caniglia
- S. Moser
Citations in the corpus
- The Statistics of Causal Inference: A View from Political Methodology (2015, unknown): “Sekhon and Titiunik (2012) present an example of estimating in-cumbency effects based on the redistricting process, where selection on observables is credible.”
- Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research (2018, background): “This is different to the concept of natural experiments, which still generally assume that research is conducted externally [137].”