On Confidence Intervals for Autoregressive Roots and Predictive Regression

By Peter C. B. Phillips. 2012

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Local to unity limit theory is used in applications to construct confidence intervals (CIs) for autoregressive roots through inversion of a unit root test (Stock (1991)). Such CIs are asymptotically valid when the true model has an autoregressive root that is local to unity (ρ = 1 + c/n), but are shown here to be invalid at the limits of the domain of definition of the localizing coefficient c because of a failure in tightness and the escape of probability mass. Failure at the boundary implies that these CIs have zero asymptotic coverage probability in the stationary case and vicinities of unity that are wider than O(n-super-−1/3). The inversion methods of Hansen (1999) and Mikusheva (2007) are asymptotically valid in such cases. Implications of these results for predictive regression tests are explored. When the predictive regressor is stationary, the popular Campbell and Yogo (2006) CIs for the regression coefficient have zero coverage probability asymptotically, and their predictive test statistic Q erroneously indicates predictability with probability approaching unity when the null of no predictability holds. These results have obvious cautionary implications for the use of the procedures in empirical practice.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/599c7c1060dcddd48a29b1be2ef01f382e96f8e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Ulrich K. Müller
  2. Mark W. Watson
  3. Ji Hyung Lee
  4. Graham Elliott
  5. Peter C. B. Phillips
  6. Yixiao Sun
  7. Sainan Jin
  8. Pierre Perron

Citations in the corpus