Do incentives build robustness in bit torrent
By Michael Piatek, Tomas Isdal, T. Anderson, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Arun Venkataramani. 2007
407 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/599c2558a3839d11e1cdc685406cfdc477970585
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andreas Haeberlen
- Paarijaat Aditya
- Mingchen Zhao
- Peter Druschel
- Kevin J. Hoffman
- Bruce MacDowell Maggs
- Yin Lin
- David Zage
Citations in the corpus
- Clustering and sharing incentives in BitTorrent systems (2006, background): “[19] observe that high-capacity peers typically provide low-capacity ones with an unfair share of the data.”
- A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems (2009, background): “More recently, reputation systems have been proposed as a means to filter out inauthentic content (pollution) for file-sharing applications [8], a method for selecting usable network resources [9], a means to identify high-quality contributions to Wikipedia [10], and a way to punish [11] or prevent ”
- P4p: provider portal for applications (2008, background): “While some P2P systems exploit locality and network status to have its clients refine their peerings, the performance improvement is limited due to factors such as limited network information and slow convergence that is further exacerbated by churn [11].”
- Peer-assisted content distribution in Akamai netsession (2013, background): “, [18,23], and on building systems that can deliver them more robustly, e.”