Hover-Net: Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images

By Simon Graham, Quoc Dang Vu, Shan E Ahmed Raza, Ayesha Azam, Yee-Wah Tsang, Jin Tae Kwak, Nasir M. Rajpoot. Medical Image Anal., 2018

1,449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Nuclear segmentation and classification within Haematoxylin & Eosin stained histology images is a fundamental prerequisite in the digital pathology work-flow. The development of automated methods for nuclear segmentation and classification enables the quantitative analysis of tens of thousands of nuclei within a whole-slide pathology image, opening up possibilities of further analysis of large-scale nuclear morphometry. However, automated nuclear segmentation and classification is faced with a major challenge in that there are several different types of nuclei, some of them exhibiting large intra-class variability such as the nuclei of tumour cells. Additionally, some of the nuclei are often clustered together. To address these challenges, we present a novel convolutional neural network for simultaneous nuclear segmentation and classification that leverages the instance-rich information encoded within the vertical and horizontal distances of nuclear pixels to their centres of mass. These distances are then utilised to separate clustered nuclei, resulting in an accurate segmentation, particularly in areas with overlapping instances. Then, for each segmented instance the network predicts the type of nucleus via a devoted up-sampling branch. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance compared to other methods on multiple independent multi-tissue histology image datasets. As part of this work, we introduce a new dataset of Haematoxylin & Eosin stained colorectal adenocarcinoma image tiles, containing 24,319 exhaustively annotated nuclei with associated class labels.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5986547c7380f5a8fb6028093f827b3662f838a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Faisal Mahmood
  2. Ming Y. Lu
  3. Drew F. K. Williamson
  4. David B. A. Epstein
  5. Simon Graham
  6. Nasir M. Rajpoot
  7. Jan Egger
  8. Constantin Seibold

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Simon Graham
  2. Jan Egger
  3. David B. A. Epstein
  4. Constantin Seibold
  5. Giulia Baldini
  6. Ming Y. Lu
  7. Jens T. Siveke
  8. Moritz Rempe

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. David B. A. Epstein
  2. Simon Graham
  3. Nasir M. Rajpoot
  4. Faisal Mahmood
  5. Olivier Gevaert

Citations in the corpus