Regeneration and colonization abilities of aquatic plant fragments: effect of disturbance seasonality

By M. Barrat-Segretain, G. Bornette. Hydrobiologia, 2000

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dispersal and colonisation of plants in lowland streams: success rates and bottlenecks (2007, background): “Barrat-Segretain & Bornette (2000) found that shoots of E. canadensis and Hippuris vulgaris L. had lower colonisation ability in terms of rooting development in spring than in autumn, and Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix and S. emersum had higher colonisation ability in autumn than in spring.”
Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration – A literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment (2007, background): “…regeneration after disturbances differing in severity (Bellingham and Sparrow, 2000; Vesk et al., 2004b; Vesk and Westoby, 2004c), whereas seasonal fluctuations in the number of buds determine the response to different timing of disturbances (Piqueras, 1999; Barrat-Segretain and Bornette, 2000).”
Propagule banks and regenerative strategies of aquatic plants (2004, background): “Drift and colonization abilities of such propagules have already been noted (Johansson et al. 1996; Cellot et al. 1998; Barrat-Segretain & Bornette 2000).”
Effects of pre-existing submersed vegetation and propagule pressure on the invasion success of Hydrilla verticillata (2008, background): “Finally, because this macrophyte disperses primarily through fragments, it has an ‘always-ready’ strategy associated with successful colonization of new areas (Barrat-Segretain & Bornette 2000).”