Asymmetric Information, Mediation, and Conflict Management
By Robert W. Rauchhaus. 2006
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5949adf9c0182c824edc147e4ec841f18d0a8300
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- P. Wallensteen
- Karl Derouen
- Isak Svensson
- Jacob Bercovitch
- Andrew H. Kydd
- P. Pospieszna
- Govinda Clayton
Citations in the corpus
- When Can Mediators Build Trust? (2006, background): “…to Rauchhaus’s definition of neutrality, having an ideal point between the ideal points of the players, or between two relevant offers on the table (Rauchhaus 2005).20 A moderate ideal point may seem like a common enough attribute for a mediator, especially wellintentioned mediators such as…”
- Introducing the Civil Wars Mediation (CWM) dataset (2011, background): “We conclude that the CWM data open new avenues for the study of mediation in civil wars.”
- Talking peace (2014, background): “By distinguishing between the third party’s preference for avoiding war and the preference over different negotiated settlements, Rauchhaus (2006) argues that both interested mediators and mediators biased in favor of the side about to accept a concession, are likely to be effective peacemakers.”