In Defense of the Learning Without Forgetting for Task Incremental Learning
25 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Catastrophic forgetting is one of the major challenges on the road for continual learning systems, which are presented with an on-line stream of tasks. The field has attracted considerable interest and a diverse set of methods have been presented for overcoming this challenge. Learning without Forgetting (LwF) is one of the earliest and most frequently cited methods. It has the advantages of not requiring the storage of samples from the previous tasks, of implementation simplicity, and of being well-grounded by relying on knowledge distillation. However, the prevailing view is that while it shows a relatively small amount of forgetting when only two tasks are introduced, it fails to scale to long sequences of tasks. This paper challenges this view, by showing that using the right architecture along with a standard set of augmentations, the results obtained by LwF surpass the latest algorithms for task incremental scenario. This improved performance is demonstrated by an extensive set of experiments over CIFAR-100 and Tiny-ImageNet, where it is also shown that other methods can-not benefit as much from similar improvements. Our code is available at: https://github.com/guy-oren/In_defence_of_LWF
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jacek Tabor
- Przemyslaw Spurek
- Tomasz Trzcinski
- Lukasz Pustelnik
- Bartosz W'ojcik
- Pawel Morawiecki
- Karol J. Piczak
- Maciej Wołczyk
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Jacek Tabor
- Przemyslaw Spurek
- Tomasz Trzcinski
- Pawel Morawiecki
- Karol J. Piczak
- Andrew Zisserman
- Lorenzo Torresani
- Luc Van Gool
Citations in the corpus
- Continual Learning with Guarantees via Weight Interval Constraints (2022, background): “This finding is consistent with the split-CIFAR-10 results and recent analysis (Oren & Wolf, 2021), and is a strong motivation to consider functional regularization in future work.”