Dusk light environment optimizes visual perception of conspecifics in a crepuscular horned beetle

By M. Théry, S. Pincebourde, François Feer. 2008

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58c2e8aee5ac1c7f2a7d53ca526e752b8bfd9b67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Chapter 8 Survivor Signals (2009, background): “Similarly, eastern chipmunks respond to the alarm calls of eastern tufted titmice (Schmidt et al., 2008).”
Light pollution is a driver of insect declines (2020, background): “Other insects may see but be unable to recognize conspecifics: male crepuscular horned beetles (Coprophanaeus lancifer) have a coloration that reflects the purplish light of dusk, and will be less apparent to females when lit by artificial light of a different spectral composition (Davies et al., 20”
An avian eavesdropping network: alarm signal reliability and heterospecific response (2009, background): “For example, some mammals eavesdrop on other mammals (Shriner 1998) or birds (Seyfarth and Cheney 1990; Lea et al. 2008; Müller and Manser 2008; Schmidt et al. 2008), and there is 1 report of a reptile eavesdropping on bird alarm calls (Vitousek et al. 2007).”
Alarm calls of tufted titmice convey information about predator size and threat (2010, background): “…encoded in alarm calls can decrease the likelihood of predation for conspecifics (Baker and Becker 2002; Templeton et al. 2005), heterospecific group members (Hurd 1996; Templeton and Greene 2007); and heterospecific eavesdroppers (Lea et al. 2008; Schmidt and Ostfeld 2008; Schmidt et al. 2008).”
Antipredator calls of tufted titmice and interspecific transfer of encoded threat information (2012, background): “engages many nonparid species as participants (Hurd 1996; Sieving et al. 2004; Langham et al. 2006; Schmidt et al. 2008), thereby providing opportunity for field tests of how animals perceive, process, share, and respond to ecologically and socially important information (Schmidt et al.”