Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias.

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The need for Bayesian hypothesis testing in psychological science (2017, background): “Molenaar, 2006), publication bias (Francis, 2013), and a blurred distinction between statistical analyses that are pre-planned and post-hoc (De Groot, 1956/2014; Wagenmakers, Wetzels, Borsboom, van der Maas, & Kievit, 2012).”
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016, background): “Most of the researcher DFs have been described in previous publications (Kriegeskorte et al., 2009; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2011; Simmons et al., 2011; Wagenmakers et al., 2011; Bakker et al., 2012; John et al., 2012; Chambers, 2013; Francis, 2013; Bakker and Wicherts, 2014; Simonsohn et al., 2014; Stee”
The Connection Between Varying Treatment Effects and the Crisis of Unreplicable Research (2015, methodology): “1177/0149206314525208Journal of ManagementGelman / Bayes, Varying Effects, and the Crisis of Unreplicable Research research-article2014 Special Issue: Bayesian Probability and Statistics in Management Research Editorial Commentary publication bias (see Francis, 2012, 2013).”