Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations
By J. Mattei, Ilkka Hanski, Oscar E. Gaggiotti. 2004
1,041 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58b05f4c56c0000abe87ebc264fb012ce56eb2a3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Alessandro Vespignani
- J. Vandermeer
- H. Rydin
- Tord Snäll
- E. Fleishman
- Vittoria Colizza
- F. Essl
- Frank M. Schurr
In Genetics
- Alessandro Vespignani
- J. Vandermeer
- Vittoria Colizza
- Anna‐Liisa Laine
- A. Rusch
- M. Valantin-Morison
- J. Roger-Estrade
- J. Sarthou
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- J. Vandermeer
- Jurek Kolasa
- Shubha N. Pandit
- Robert D. Holt
- F. Essl
- Alessandro Vespignani
- H. Rydin
- Tord Snäll
Citations in the corpus
- Epidemic modeling in metapopulation systems with heterogeneous coupling pattern: theory and simulations. (2007, methodology): “Metapopulation models describe spatially structured interacting subpopulations, such as city locations, urban areas, or defined geographical regions (Hanski and Gaggiotti, 2004; Grenfell and Harwood, 1997).”
- Networks and the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease (2010, background): “Thus, the detail of the inference is determined to a large extent by the available detail in the network data [145].”
- Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape (2005, background): “106 Key words: boreo-nemoral; colonization; dynamic landscape; epidemiology; epiphytic moss; extinction; Neckera pennata; parameterization; patch-tracking metapopulation; single-tree patch; Sweden.”
- Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. (2009, background): “Applying metacommunity theory in general or the four metacommunity models in particular to natural patterns of variation in community structure requires considerable empirical work (Leibold and Miller 2004).”