A Capital or Capabilities Education Narrative in a World of Staggering Inequalities
By M. Walker. 2012
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract In a world of tremendous inequalities, this paper explores two contrasting normative models for education policy, and the relationship of each to policy, practices and outcomes that can improve lives by reducing injustice and building societies which value capabilities for all. The first model is that of human capital which currently dominates contemporary education policy globally, harnessing education policy to economic growth imperatives so that development through education is the means to the end of increased resources and income. The second model draws on the work of Amartya Sen to present a human capabilities model of education policy in which human lives are the end of development and the education focus is on promoting capabilities and functionings to choose a good life. An argument is advanced for capabilities as the superior approach. The paper closes by noting the problematic of social change and struggle demanded by a transformative view of education and how or if the capability approach is adequate to the task.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58aeddb43a2e6238bec10aa4ce8ad24de312e07c
Citations in the corpus
- Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, unknown): “…Apsan Frediani, Boni and Gasper (2014); Unterhalter (2003a, b, 2009, 2013); Hart (2009, 2012); Peppin Vaughan (2011, 2016); Peppin Vaughan and Walker (2012); Saito (2003); Nussbaum (2002b, 2006a); Walker (2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012a, 2012b), Loots and Walker (2015, 2016); Mutanga and…”