A practical affine equivariant multivariate median
By Thomas P. Hettmansperger, Ronald H. Randles. 2002
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58ae5a83ba98177ab33647d8264b9778f22b87b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Marc Hallin
- Davy Paindaveine
- Thomas Verdebout
- Hannu Oja
- Changliang Zou
- Zhaojun Wang
- Long Feng
- Ronald H. Randles
Citations in the corpus
- Elliptical graphical modelling (2011, background): “Here μ̂n is an appropriate location estimator, which may be the mean, or, in light of robustness, the Hettmansperger-Randles median (Hettmansperger and Randles, 2002). Existence and uniqueness of a solution of (5.19) and the asymptotic properties of the estimator T̂n are treated in the original publ”
- Influence functions and efficiencies of the canonical correlation and vector estimates based on scatter and shape matrices (2006, background): “Tyler's M estimate has a low breakdown point, but is very fast to compute (see Hettmansperger and Randles, 2002 ), and has good efficiency in larger dimensions.”
- Sign test of independence between two random vectors (2003, methodology): “In Hettmansperger and Randles (2002) estimates µ̂ and V̂ are obtained as follows.”
- Multivariate-Sign-Based High-Dimensional Tests for the Two-Sample Location Problem (2016, methodology): “11.3) Q2n = p 2∑ i=1 niÛTi Ûi, (2) where Ûi = n−1i ∑ni j=1 Ûi j, Ûi j = U (S−1/2(Xi j − θ̂)), θ̂ and S−1/2 are Hettmansperger and Randles (2002) estimates (HRE) of location and scatter matrix so that 2∑ i=1 ni∑ j=1 Ûi j = 0 and pn−1 2∑ i=1 ni∑ j=1 Ûi jÛTi j = Ip.”
- SEMIPARAMETRICALLY EFFICIENT RANK-BASED INFERENCE FOR SHAPE II. OPTIMAL R-ESTIMATION OF SHAPE (2006, unknown): “(2.2) Although any root-n consistent estimator θ̂ could be used, we suggest adopting the multivariate affine-equivariant median introduced by Hettmansperger and Randles [18] which is itself a “sign-based” estimator.”
- Symmetrised M-estimators of multivariate scatter (2007, background): “Previously proposed algorithms either have restrictions on the weight functions or do not have rigorous proofs of convergence, see Hettmansperger and Randles [6].”
- OPTIMAL RANK-BASED TESTING FOR PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS (2010, methodology): “Denote by θ̂HR the Hettmansperger and Randles (2002) affine-equivariant median, and by V̂Tyler the shape estimator of Tyler (1987), normalized so that it has determinant one: both are root-n consistent under any radial density g1.”
- Multivariate Nonparametric Tests of Independence (2005, background): “Here the observations are centered on some affineequivariant location estimator µ̂ (1) based on x(1)1 , . . . ,x (1) n , for example, the Oja (1983) median or the transformationretransformation spatial median (Hettmansperger and Randles 2002).”
- Sign and Rank Covariance Matrices: Statistical Properties and Application to Principal Components Analysis (2002, background): “Tyler’s scatter matrix estimate Hettmansperger and Randles [3] discussed location and scatter estimate based on spatial signs, but now resulting in an affine equivariant procedure.”
- Multivariate Nonparametric Tests (2004, methodology): “A multivariate median estimating a directional center of the population and corresponding to the sign test based onQ2 in the Hodges–Lehmann sense was developed by Hettmansperger and Randles (2002).”