A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems
By Maja Schlüter, Andrés Baeza, G. Dressler, Karin Frank, Jürgen Groeneveld, Wander Jager, Marco A. Janssen, R. McALLISTER, Birgit Müller, Kirill Orach and 2 more. 2017
443 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58a9de529bbd5ac4ec434cb201efa571b9ccc487
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- Peter Messerli
- J. Bergh
- K. Erb
- Eric F. Lambin
- Peter H. Verburg
- Tobias Kuemmerle
- Erle C. Ellis
- Maja Schlüter
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Patrick Meyfroidt
- Birgit Müller
- J. Bergh
- Eric F. Lambin
- Jürgen Groeneveld
- Christian Klassert
- Tobias Kuemmerle
- Nina Schwarz
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Bergh
- Eric F. Lambin
- Nga Nguyen
- Tobias Kuemmerle
- R. Lapeyre
- R. R. Chowdhury
- Erle C. Ellis
- Maja Schlüter
Citations in the corpus
- A review of agent‐based modeling of climate‐energy policy (2020, background): “Different authors suggest distinct ways to classify behavior and decision-making (e.g., Balke & Gilbert, 2014; Kennedy, 2012; Schlüter et al., 2017).”
- Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework (2019, result): “Whichever the nature of motivation crowding, the alleged direct causality between changes in motivations and behaviours might not always hold, since some studies have suggested that motivations and behaviours are not always aligned (Steg and Zlek, 2009; Schluter, 2017).”
- Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models - A review (2017, background): “…gaps and to advance in this fi eld: (1) To develop a structured guided framework which enables modellers to make informed decisions about what decision model to use and which factors to include (see for instance the framework MoHuB ( Mo delling Hu man B ehavior) presented in Schlüter et al., 2017).”
- Middle-range theories of land system change (2018, background): “change, and social norms related to land use (Meyfroidt, 2013; Schlüter et al., 2017; Groeneveld et al., 2017; van Duinen et al., 2015).”
- Farmers intention to adopt sustainable agriculture hinges on climate awareness: The case of Vietnamese coffee (2021, methodology): “…of Rational Actor, Bounded Rationality, Expected Utility), to psychological ones, in which societal groups evaluate decisions based on their intention, social norms or the combination of both (e.g., Theory of Planned Behavior, Descriptive Norms and Habitual Learning) (Schlüter et al., 2017).”