Mechanical properties of alloy Ti–6Al–4V and of stainless steel 316L processed by selective laser melting: Influence of out-of-equilibrium microstructures

By A. Mertens, Sylvie Reginster, Hakan Paydas, Q. Contrepois, T. Dormal, O. Lemaire, Jacqueline Lecomte-Beckers. 2014

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Differences in microstructure and properties between selective laser melting and traditional manufacturing for fabrication of metal parts: A review (2015, unknown): “SLM [63] X 534 6, Y 528 4, Z 444 27 X 653 3, Y 659 3, Z 567 19 X 16.”
A review of the as-built SLM Ti-6Al-4V mechanical properties towards achieving fatigue resistant designs (2018, background): “Mertens [44] Flat XZY α′ martensite <0.”
Laser cladding as repair technology for Ti–6Al–4V alloy: Influence of building strategy on microstructure and hardness (2015, background): “This might be somewhat overestimated since stainless steel exhibits a significantly higher thermal conductivity than Ti-6Al-4V [20].”
Effect of processing parameters on microstructure and tensile properties of austenitic stainless steel 304L made by directed energy deposition additive manufacturing (2016, background): “In addition, gas entrapment pores and lack of fusion defects are frequently formed during AM, which can be detrimental to the mechanical properties, and particularly ductility, of the component [4,5].”
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties (2018, background): “The low elongation in these materials is also a combination of factors, including the general tradeoff between strength and ductility, higher dislocation density in AM, finer grain features leading to dislocation pileup at grain boundaries or internal defects such as sharp lack-of-fusion defects, wh”