Anticipating PEV buyers’ acceptance of utility controlled charging

By J. Bailey, John Axsen. 2015

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5869d1c33f811e9ba2ecfca0de5be871dfd00ad6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. J. Bailey
2. Benjamin Sovacool
3. Suzanne Goldberg
4. John Axsen
5. Nicolò Daina
6. Caroline E. Leonard
7. Laurie A. Garrow
8. Brian J. German

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Suzanne Goldberg
2. John Axsen
3. J. Bailey
4. Benjamin Sovacool

In Pollution

1. J. Bailey
2. Suzanne Goldberg
3. Benjamin Sovacool
4. John Axsen
5. Nicolò Daina
6. Vlado Vivoda
7. Stefan Bouzarovski
8. Christian Breyer

Citations in the corpus

• Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment (2019, background): “For example, Bailey & Axsen studied the preferences for electric vehicles with utility controlled charging (UCC) and found that acceptance of UCC would vary widely across the population (15).”
• How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? (2016, methodology): “The choice experiment is explained in detail in Bailey and Axsen (2015).”
• Electric vehicle charging choices: Modelling and implications for smart charging services (2017, background): “To date behavioural studies around smart charging propositions have mainly focused on acceptance of smart charging services rather than trying to assess the users charging behaviour response (Bailey and Axsen, 2015; Will and Schuller, 2016).”
• A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure (2018, unknown): “A study using surveys and interviews with mainstream car buyers found that they are less willing to accept smart charging (Bailey and Axsen, 2015).”
• The rise of electric vehicles—2020 status and future expectations (2021, unknown): “Privacy concerns are one of the major obstacles to user acceptance (as is fear of loss of control over charging) (Bailey and Axsen 2015).”
• Urban air mobility: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis with autonomous and electric ground transportation for informing future research (2021, background): “Multiple studies have shown that controlledcharging of EVs, including time-of-day pricing, can better balance loads on the electric grid and impact power grid loads, voltage, frequency, and power losses (Bailey and Axsen, 2015; Daina et al., 2017; Latinopoulos et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2017).”