Context Matters: Effects of the Proportion of Fundamentalists on Gender Attitudes

By Laura M. Moore, Reeve D. Vanneman. 2003

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58679b6daa1caf9dcaa2a529e2994675ae073ea9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. G. Pendell
2. Tanya Koropeckyj‐Cox
3. Breanne Fahs
4. D. Frost

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Pendell
2. E. Swank
3. Tanya Koropeckyj‐Cox
4. Breanne Fahs
5. D. Frost
6. I. Meyer
7. M. Botha

Citations in the corpus

• Attitudes About Childlessness in the United States (2007, background): “For example, the prevalence of particular beliefs or a high level of conservatism in a state or local area may likely play an important, separate role in shaping individual attitudes (see Moore & Vanneman, 2003 ).”
• Rural location and exposure to minority stress among sexual minorities in the United States (2012, background): “Also, Southern states embrace greater gender conservatism because they contain higher concentrations of poor religious fundamentalists who have less access to higher education (Moore & Vanneman, 2003).”