Recovery of cobalt sulfate from spent lithium ion batteries by reductive leaching and solvent extraction with Cyanex 272
By Jin-gu Kang, G. Senanayake, J. Sohn, S. Shin. 2010
414 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/583d715d554d7ad0696eb612e88c1e6577864b12
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- An overview on the processes and technologies for recycling cathodic active materials from spent lithium-ion batteries (2013, methodology): “hexyl) phosphoric acid (D2EHPA) [49], bis-(2,4,4-trimethyl-pentyl) phosphinic acid (Cyanex 272) [4, 16, 28, 44, 47, 48], trioctylamine (TOA) [7], diethylhexyl phosphoric acid (DEHPA) or 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2ethylhexyl ester (PC-88A) [7, 26, 38, 47, 48] are usually used to separate the ”
- A Mini-Review on Metal Recycling from Spent Lithium Ion Batteries (2018, background): “The inorganic acids hydrochloric acid (HCl) [14,48–50], H2SO4 [11,28,29,31,51], nitric acid (HNO3) [52], and phosphoric acid (H3PO4) [53,54] are usually used as leaching agents to leach metals from spent LIBs.”
- Extraction of lithium from primary and secondary sources by pre-treatment, leaching and separation: A comprehensive review (2014, methodology): “…are carried out with different acids like HCl (Contestabile et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 1998), H2SO4 (Aktas et al., 2006; Dorella and Mansur, 2007; Kang et al., 2010a,b; Nan et al., 2005; Shin et al., 2005; Swain et al., 2007), HNO3 (Lee and Rhee, 2002, 2003), and a few organic acids like…”
- Acid leaching of mixed spent Li-ion batteries (2017, background): “Due to its good performance compared to the other batteries, LIBs are becoming the most dominant powerful source (Wang et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2011; Kang et al., 2010a,b).”