Species Competition and Predation
By P. Chesson. 2013
101 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5836c5790ba2ea7a5d74a60b3574f743f28f62c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Chesson's coexistence theory (2018, methodology): “In a parallel development, Chesson (1990), Chesson and Kuang (2008), Chesson (2011, 2013) develop a very similar concept but in a different context.”
- Updates on mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity (2018, methodology): “The idea that resource competition in one trophic level implies apparent competition in the trophic level below extends to the idea that resource partitioning in one trophic level implies natural enemy partitioning in the trophic level below (Chesson, 2012).”
- How to quantify competitive ability (2018, methodology): “On the basis of this model, the competitive ability of species i can be obtained following methods developed by Chesson (Appendix S1; Chesson, 2000, 2012; Godoy & Levine, 2014), yielding the following expression: (1)Ni,t+1=Ni,t λi 1+αiiNi,t+αijNj,t (2) λi−1 √ αijαii The numerator of expression 2 is…”
- Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory (2017, methodology): “…of invader growth rates of a focal individual grown at varying densities in monoculture and with heterospecifics is sufficient to obtain competition coefficients (Inouye, 2001), which in turn can be used to calculate niche overlap and average fitness differences (Chesson, 2013, Godoy et al., 2014).”