Resistance of insect pests to neonicotinoid insecticides: current status and future prospects.

By R. Nauen, I. Denholm. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2005

635 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/582df1f5ce875878bfcddea4bec43dbaaa43594b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. Dave Goulson
2. C. Morrissey
3. P. Mineau
4. D. Gibbons
5. J. Lucas
6. I. Denholm
7. N. Simon-Delso
8. M. Liess

In Plant Science

1. J. Lucas
2. S. Saeed
3. R. Nauen
4. I. Denholm
5. Dave Goulson
6. F. J. Calvo
7. Robert L. Nichols
8. Judith K. Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Fitness costs and morphological change of laboratory‐selected thiamethoxam resistance in the B‐type Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) (2009, background): “tabaci and other sucking insects in horticultural and other cropping systems (Nauen and Denholm 2005).”
• New Challenges to Management of Whitefly Resistance to Insecticides in Arizona (2005, background): “Reports in the literature (e.g., Nauen and Denholm 2005) and our past experience in Arizona (Dennehy et al. 1999) have shown that whiteflies possessing resistance to imidacloprid are capable of surviving bioassay concentrations of as high as 1000 µg/ml imidacloprid.”
• Cross-resistance, inheritance and stability of resistance to acetamiprid in cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) (2011, background): “Resurgence of the pest could be due to several factors including climate, cropping practice (Byrne and Devonshire, 1993) and development of resistance to insecticides (Palumbo et al., 2001, 2003; Ahmad et al., 2002; Nauen and Denholm, 2005).”
• Advances in plant disease and pest management (2010, background): “For some agricultural pests, chemical control now relies heavily on neonicotinoids that to date have proved relatively resilient to resistance development (Nauen & Denholm 2005).”
• The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides. (2015, background): “This review summarizes the global status of neonicotinoid resistance in a range of important insect pests with a particular focus on the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying resistance, and on information reported since the last comprehensive review of this subject published ten years ago”
• Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites (2014, background): “Examples are the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Karatolos et al. 2010), the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Prabhakar et al. 1997; Cahill et al. 1996), and the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Nauen and Denholm 2005; Szendrei et al. 2012; Alyokhin et al. 2007).”
• Biological control-based IPM in sweet pepper greenhouses using Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) (2012, background): “…as the number of effective and permitted active ingredients is reduced by both pesticide resistance (Espinosa, Bielza, Contreras, and Lacasa 2002; Nauen and Denholm 2005; Bielza 2008; Fernández, Gravalos, Haro, Cifuentes, and Bielza 2009) and market and governmental residue tolerance…”