OVERVIEW ON NATIVE CELLULOSE AND MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE I STRUCTURE STUDIED BY X-RAY DIFFRACTION (WAXD): COMPARISON BETWEEN MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

By N. Terinte, R. Ibbett, K. Schuster. 2011

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/582cc8e162ac0aaa492c25bbe7ffdcd67ee48826

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials (2016, methodology): “A common strategy in this regard is to produce a cellulase that is lacking the so-called cellulose binding domain, which is required to perform the hydrolysis reaction on a solid substrate [44].”
Comparison of sample crystallinity determination methods by X-ray diffraction for challenging cellulose I materials (2016, background): “…balsa (86 and 159 g/cm3, respectively) (Borrega et al. 2015), spruce-pine sulphite pulp and nata de coco (Parviainen et al. 2014), birch pulp (Testova et al. 2014), bamboo (Dixon et al. 2015), and MCC from birch sulphite, poplar kraft and cotton linters (Leppänen et al. 2009) were analyzed.”
Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose via low-intensity ultrasonic-assisted sulfuric acid hydrolysis (2014, methodology): “There are various available methods for crystallinity measurement, such as XRD, solid state (13)C CP-MAS NMR, FT-IR spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy (Terinte et al. 2011).”
Morphology, Structure, and Mechanical Properties of Natural Cellulose Fiber from Mendong Grass (Fimbristylis globulosa) (2014, background): “…of diffraction of the noncrystalline material, which is taken at an angle of about 18◦ 2θ in the valley among the peaks with minimum intensity representing amorphous material in the cellulose fiber (Terinte et al. 2011) CI = I(002) − Iam I(002) × 100%, (3) %Cr = I(002) Iam + I(002) × 100%.”