Penguins predict their performance

By Rory P. Wilson. 2003

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5829ceeef81ff14db60657ef241c7a7a972e4b39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Bearhop
2. J. Newton
3. S. Votier
4. S. Patrick
5. Kc Hamer
6. R. D. Davies
7. Ewan D. Wakefield
8. I. Cleasby

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Newton
2. Kc Hamer
3. Ewan D. Wakefield
4. S. Patrick
5. I. Cleasby
6. T. Bodey
7. S. Votier
8. S. Bearhop

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Newton
2. Kc Hamer
3. Ewan D. Wakefield
4. I. Cleasby
5. S. Votier
6. S. Bearhop

Citations in the corpus

• Perspectives in Ornithology: Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds (2009, unknown): “…prior to diving and can modif y this in relation to the expected dive depth (one extra breath for ~2.5 m increase in depth) or number of prey they expect to catch once a school is located (one breath added for approximately every four fish caught) (Wilson 2003, Ropert-Coudert and Wilson 2005).”
• Sexual segregation in a wide-ranging marine predator is a consequence of habitat selection (2015, background): “Such a difference may reflect the vertical distribution of prey that males and females 362 target when foraging or assessing prey densities (Wilson 2003, Machovsky Capuska et al. 363 2011, Machovsky Capuska et al. 2013).”