Analysis of rotation curves in the framework of Rn gravity

By C. Martins, P. Salucci. 2007

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT We present an analysis of a devised sample of Rotation Curves (RCs), aimed atchecking the consequences of a modified f(R) gravity on galactic scales. Originallymotivated by the the dark energy mystery, this theory may serve as a possibility ofexplaining the observed non-Keplerian profiles of galactic RCs in terms of a break-down of the Einstein General Relativity. We show that in general the power-law f(R)version could fit well the observations with reasonable values for the mass modelparameters, encouraging further investigation on R n gravity from both observationaland theoretical points of view.Key words: gravitation – dark matter – galaxies: kinematics and dynamics 1 INTRODUCTIONIt is well-known that the RCs of spiral galaxies show a non-Keplerian circular velocity profile which cannot be explainedby considering a Newtonian gravitational potential gener-ated by the baryonic matter (Persic, Salucci & Stel 1996).Current possible explanation of this controversy includes,among others, the postulate of a new yet not detected stateof matter, the dark matter (Rubin 1983), a phenomeno-logical modification of the Newtonian dynamics (Milgrom1983; Brownstein & Moffat 2006; Sanders & McGaugh 2002;Bekenstein 2007), and higher order gravitational theories(originally devoted to solve the dark energy issue, see e.g.,(Carroll et al. 2004; Capozziello et al. 2004)).The recent theory proposed by Capozziello, Cardone &Troisi 2007 (hereafter CCT), modifies the usual Newtonianpotential generated by baryonic matter in such a way thatthe predicted galaxy kinematics and the observed one havea much better agreement. They consider power-law fourthorder⋆ theories of gravity obtained by replacing in the grav-ity action the Ricci scalar R with a function f(R) ∝ R

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5827014684a757a9c56ce7caeb91a8014a8c75e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Sotiriou
  2. Valerio Faraoni
  3. S. Tsujikawa
  4. Francisco S. N. Lobo
  5. Antonio de Felice
  6. Tiberiu Harko
  7. Salvatore Capozziello
  8. Sergei D. Odintsov

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. T. Sotiriou
  2. Valerio Faraoni
  3. S. Tsujikawa
  4. Antonio de Felice
  5. Kurt Hinterbichler
  6. Salvatore Capozziello
  7. Francisco S. N. Lobo
  8. Tiberiu Harko

Citations in the corpus