An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion
By B. Kort, R. Reilly, Rosalind W. Picard. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2001
829 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57ea5a83a1b91d8eaf4fe9e08ca5efbf6a3e90e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Scotty D. Craig
- Barry Gholson
- A. Graesser
- Katherine Forbes-Riley
- Diane J. Litman
- S. D’Mello
- Liping Shen
- R. Shen
Citations in the corpus
- The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes (2008, background): “Other researchers such as Kort et al. (Aist et al., 2002; Kort et al., 2001), and Zhou and Conati (2003) have been addressing the problem of detecting learner affect and motivation, and influencing it.”
- Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous Brain-Computer Interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design (2013, background): “Kort et al. (2001) mention that negative emotions or cognitive-emotive states can be useful and integral parts of the learning process.”
- Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features (2010, background): “(Conati 2002; Conati and Maclaren 2009; D’Mello et al. 2005, 2007; De Vicente and Pain 2002; Forbes-Riley et al. 2008; Kort et al. 2001; McQuiggan et al. 2008; Woolf et al. 2 We also investigated decision-level fusion.”
- Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents (2005, background): “He expressed emotion that commonly occurs in learning, such as frustration, confusion, and enjoyment (Kort et al., 2001); thus, he was not always positive and supportive, but at times demonstrated his difficulty with the content to model coping strategies.”
- Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments (2010, background): “Csikszentmihalyi, 1990), frustration (Kort et al., 2001; Patrick et al., 1993), and surprise (Schutzwohl and Borgstedt, 2005).”
- Detection of Emotions during Learning with AutoTutor (2006, background): “However, the emotions that Ekman intensely investigated (e.g., sadness, happiness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise) have minimal relevance to learning per se (Kort et al., 2001).”
- Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor (2004, methodology): “As learners move up the spiral, cycle after cycle, they become more competent and acquire more domain knowledge (Kort et al ., 2001a,b).”
- Predicting Student Emotions in Computer-Human Tutoring Dialogues (2004, methodology): “Another method for closing this performance gap has been to incorporate affective reasoning into computer tutoring systems, independently of whether or not the tutor is dialogue-based (Conati et al., 2003; Kort et al., 2001; Bhatt et al., 2004).”
- Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues (2008, background): “2001), delight (Fredrickson and Branigan 2005; Silvia and Abele 2002), flow (Csikszentmihalyi 1990), frustration (Kort et al. 2001; Patrick et al. 1993), and surprise (Schutzwohl and Borgstedt 2005).”