The two-dimensional Keller-Segel model after blow-up
By Jean Dolbeault, Christian Schmeiser. 2009
77 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Simulation, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57e2d71969b11adc6603f8a462aed11591a72e05
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Jacob Bedrossian
- Adrien Blanchet
- Nader Masmoudi
- José Antonio Carrillo
- Eric A. Carlen
- Philippe Souplet
- N. Mizoguchi
- Cédric Villani
In Modeling and Simulation
- Jacob Bedrossian
- Nader Masmoudi
- Adrien Blanchet
- José Antonio Carrillo
- Eric A. Carlen
- Philippe Souplet
- N. Mizoguchi
- Vincent Calvez
In Molecular Biology
- Jacob Bedrossian
- Adrien Blanchet
- Nader Masmoudi
- José Antonio Carrillo
- Eric A. Carlen
- Philippe Souplet
- N. Mizoguchi
- Tian Xiang
Citations in the corpus
- Existence, Uniqueness and Lipschitz Dependence for Patlak-Keller-Segel and Navier-Stokes in R2 with Measure-valued Initial Data (2012, methodology): “1) in the sense of Poupaud’s weak solutions [60], which make sense even if there are mass concentrations, have been constructed by Dolbeault and Schmeiser in [31] by taking sequences of regularized problems and extracting a measure for u(t) along with an appropriate ‘defect measure’ to make sense of”
- Nondegeneracy of blow-up points for the parabolic Keller–Segel system (2014, background): “Finally, let us mention that the question of the continuation of solutions after blow-up for Γ = 0, with persistence of moving Dirac masses, has also been studied (see [13,30,49] and the references therein).”
- Existence, Uniqueness and Lipschitz Dependence for Patlak–Keller–Segel and Navier–Stokes in $${\mathbb{R}^2}$$R2 with Measure-Valued Initial Data (2012, background): “1) in the sense of Poupaud’s weak solutions [60], which make sense even if there are mass concentrations, have been constructed by Dolbeault and Schmeiser in [31] by taking sequences of regularized problems and extracting a measure for u(t) along with 3”
- Functional inequalities, thick tails and asymptotics for the critical mass Patlak–Keller–Segel model (2010, background): “ the t→ ∞ limit of any such solution is a Dirac mass 8πat the center of mass of the initial data. Furthermore, a point mass of mass Mis a stationary measure-valued solution in the sense introduced in [22] if and only if M≥ 8π. Let us finally mention that an analysis of basins of attraction of λ in th”