ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING ONTOGENETIC HABITAT SHIFTS IN A CORAL REEF FISH

By C. Dahlgren, D. Eggleston. 2000

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57dbc5482609e9af82a135ee180fe10b9457ac86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. I. Nagelkerken
2. Rod M. Connolly
3. G. Velde
4. K. Able
5. C. Layman
6. SJ Pittman
7. Jane Elith
8. M. Dorenbosch

In Global and Planetary Change

1. I. Nagelkerken
2. G. Velde
3. K. Able
4. C. Layman
5. Rod M. Connolly
6. SJ Pittman
7. M. Dorenbosch
8. A. Whitfield

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. I. Nagelkerken
2. Jane Elith
3. Hugh P. Possingham
4. G. Velde
5. M. Wuenschel
6. P. Sale
7. P. Chittaro
8. P. Usseglio

Citations in the corpus

• Passive acoustic telemetry reveals highly variable home range and movement patterns among unicornfish within a marine reserve (2011, background): “A correlation between home range size and body size can be driven by underlying ecological processes, such as ontogenetic shifts in habitat preference (Light and Jones 1997; Dahlgren and Eggleston 2000; Nakamura and Tsuchiya 2008).”
• Effect of temperature and salinity on otolith element incorporation in juvenile gray snapper Lutjanus griseus (2006, background): “Specifically for reef fish, many species use a variety of non-reef habitats as juvenile nurseries (Chester & Thayer 1990, Eggleston 1995, Ross & Moser 1995, Dahlgren & Eggleston 2000, Allman & Grimes 2002).”
• Influence of habitat configuration on connectivity between fish assemblages of Caribbean seagrass beds, mangroves and coral reefs (2007, background): “Seagrass and mangrove habitats are likely to be attractive for juvenile fishes because they are characterised by high food availability and low predation pressure (Blaber 2000, Dahlgren & Eggleston 2000, Beck et al. 2001).”
• Effects of early experience on group behaviour in fish (2007, background): “…Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, U.K. and the School of Forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, Forest Resources Building, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A. 80 03e3472/07/$30.00/0 2007 The Association for the S environment (Dahlgren & Eggleston 2000; Losos et al. 2004).”
• Variation in fish density, assemblage composition and relative rates of predation among mangrove, seagrass and coral reef habitats (2005, methodology): “Based on tether experiments at Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas, Dahlgren & Eggleston (2000) indicated that algal beds had lower levels of mortality for Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus, and thus suggested why juveniles occupy these habitats.”
• Progression of invasive lionfish in seagrass, mangrove and reef habitats. (2012, background): “…greater refuge from predators in shallow habitats (see reviews in Heck et al. 2003, Sheridan & Hays 2003) and that choice of these habitats reflects a trade-off between growth and survival, favouring survival at the expense of reduced growth (Dahlgren & Eggleston 2000, Grol et al. 2008, 2011).”
• Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities (2011, background): “Ontogenetic shifts in habitat use and environmental tolerance/preference are common in mobile marine species (Dahlgren & Eggleston, 2000; Wilson et al., 2008) and have also been noted in benthic sessile species (Hiddink, 2003; Manzur et al., 2010).”
• Marine reserves for Caribbean spiny lobster: empirical evaluation and theoretical metapopulation recruitment dynamics (2001, background): “, Porites coral clumps) that are inhabited by postlarval and juvenile Caribbean spiny lobster and Nassau grouper (Herrnkind and Lipcius 1989; Eggleston 1995; Lipcius et al. 1997; Dahlgren and Eggleston 2000).”
• Nursery value of Cystoseira forests for Mediterranean rocky reef fishes (2013, background): “Juveniles may indeed select the habitat which provides them the best compromise according to predation rates and food availability (Dahlgren and Eggleston, 2000; Horinouchi et al., 2009).”
• Evidence of connectivity between juvenile and adult habitats for mobile marine fauna : an important component of nurseries (2003, background): “Movement from juvenile to adult habitats is usually associated with reproduction or an ontogenetic or seasonal habitat shift probably due to changing ratios of mortality risk to growth rate (Gilliam & Fraser 1987, Dahlgren & Eggleston 2000).”
• The influence of prey availability on ontogenetic diet shifts of a juvenile piscivore (2006, background): “1997; Plaistow and Siva 1999), mammals (Adams 1996), reptiles (Young 1989; Rocha 1998), amphibians (Dupre and Petranka 1985), and both freshwater and marine fish (Osenberg et al. 1988; Dahlgren and Eggleston 2000; Hjelm et al. 2000).”
• Size matters: a test of boldness in eight populations of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi (2004, unknown): “There are numerous models examining whether juvenile fish choose habitats that maximize growth rate or minimize predation risk or whether they attempt to minimize the ratio of risk to growth (Dahlgren & Eggleston 2000; Skalski & Gilliam 2002).”
• The seascape nursery: a novel spatial approach to identify and manage nurseries for coastal marine fauna (2015, unknown): “Less structurally complex habitats such as sand patches, macroalgal clumps or dead coral rubble may function as important settlement habitats (Dahlgren and Eggleston 2000), but are often disregarded in their value for settling larvae.”
• Role of habitat in mediating mortality during the post‐settlement transition phase of temperate marine fishes (2007, background): “Similarly, in juvenile Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus Bloch), ontogenetic habitat shifts are consistent with the minimization of mortality to growth highlighting the role of behavioural responses to size-dependent predation risk (Dahlgren & Eggleston, 2000).”