Learning spatiotemporal graphs of human activities
By William Brendel, Sinisa Todorovic. 2011
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Luc Van Gool
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Bernt Schiele
- Yu Qiao
- Trevor Darrell
- Li Fei-Fei
- Song-Chun Zhu
- Andrew Zisserman
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Xiaogang Wang
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jitendra Malik
- Andrew Zisserman
- Cordelia Schmid
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain? (2017, methodology): “…techniques such as Bayesian Program Learning (Lake et al., 2015), learning models of causal relationships (Maier et al., 2010, 2013; Aalen et al., 2016), and stochastic grammars to learn more inter-pretable structures (Brendel and Todorovic, 2011; Zhou and De la Torre, 2012; Park et al., 2016).”
- 3D Human Activity Recognition with Reconfigurable Convolutional Neural Networks (2014, background): “re studied in [30] to represent 3D human activities with a new feature called local occupancy pattern (LOP). To handle more complicated activities with large temporal variations, some powerful models [26, 31, 2] further discovered temporal structures of activities by localizing sequential actions. F”
- Structural-RNN: Deep Learning on Spatio-Temporal Graphs (2015, methodology): “Spatio-temporal graphs (st-graphs) are a popular [39, 37, 4, 11, 32, 65, 22] general tool for representing such high-level spatio-temporal structures.”
- Factorized Graph Matching (2016, methodology): “Our algorithm exploits the particular structure of the affinity matrix and is able to factorize it as a Kronecker product of four smaller matrices.”
- Spatiotemporal Deformable Part Models for Action Detection (2013, methodology): “We believe that a hybrid action detection system that incorporates our ideas could achieve further gains.”
- Video Action Detection with Relational Dynamic-Poselets (2014, background): “Several previous works [9,3,19,28,18] have considered the relations among parts for action recognition and detection.”
- A Deep Structured Model with Radius–Margin Bound for 3D Human Activity Recognition (2015, background): “To handle more complicated activities with large temporal variations, some improved models [38, 43, 3] discovered temporal structures of activities by localizing sequential actions.”
- Discriminative prototype selection methods for graph embedding (2013, background): “…Switzerland a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 6 July 2012 Received in revised form 24 September 2012 Accepted 21 November 2012 Keywords: Graph embedding Discriminative prototype selection Graph classification Dissimilarity representation 03/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd.”
- Poselet Key-Framing: A Model for Human Activity Recognition (2013, background): “Therefore, holistic BoW representations of the video perform poorly [26] relative to high-level description-based methods [4, 14, 34] (Table 1).”
- Max-Margin Early Event Detectors (2012, background): “2011; Reddy and Shah 2012), and activity recognition (e.g., Brand et al. 1997; Yacoob and Black 1999; Chomat and Crowley 1999; Dollár et al. 2005; Tran and Davis 2008; Nguyen et al. 2009; Ryoo and Aggarwal 2009; Brendel and Todorovic 2011).”
- Trajectory-Based Modeling of Human Actions with Motion Reference Points (2012, methodology): “On Olympic Sports, we attain better results than all the state of the arts, including an attribute-based action learningmethod [35] and a graph-based actionmodeling approach [36].”
- Discovering discriminative action parts from mid-level video representations (2012, methodology): “Recently, Brendel and Todorovic [5] and Lan et al. [16] proposed activity models that also enable them to learn the relevant action parts of the video.”
- Human Action Recognition in Unconstrained Videos by Explicit Motion Modeling (2015, result): “On Olympic Sports, we attain better results than most of the compared approaches, including an attribute-based action learning method [19], a graph-based action modeling approach [61], a new sparse coding-based representation [62], a method modeling the dynamics of action attributes over time [64], ”
- Fast Exact Hyper-graph Matching with Dynamic Programming for Spatio-temporal Data (2014, unknown): “In a different vein, Brendel and Todorovic [10] formulated the graph matching problem as a weighted least squares problem on the set permutation matrices.”
- Representing Videos Using Mid-level Discriminative Patches (2013, background): “These examples show how strong correspondence can allow us to perform tasks such as object detection, pose estimation and predicting temporal extent.”
- Prediction of Human Activity by Discovering Temporal Sequence Patterns (2014, background): “an effective representation for prediction, human activities can be characterized by a complex temporal composition of constituent simple actions and interacting objects.”
- Activity representation with motion hierarchies (2013, unknown): “In addition, we use neither video segmentation techniques [Brendel and Todorovic, 2011, Brox and Malik, 2010, Grundmann et al, 2008, Lezama et al, 2011], nor manually pre-defined semantic attribute detectors [Prest et al, 2012, Sadanand and Corso, 2012].”
- Matching Guided Distillation (2020, unknown): “recognition [1].”