Measuring and Improving BERT’s Mathematical Abilities by Predicting the Order of Reasoning.

By Piotr Pikekos, Henryk Michalewski, Mateusz Malinowski. 2021

32 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Imagine you are in a supermarket. You have two bananas in your basket and want to buy four apples. How many fruits do you have in total? This seemingly straightforward question can be challenging for data-driven language models, even if trained at scale. However, we would expect such generic language models to possess some mathematical abilities in addition to typical linguistic competence. Towards this goal, we investigate if a commonly used language model, BERT, possesses such mathematical abilities and, if so, to what degree. For that, we fine-tune BERT on a popular dataset for word math problems, AQuA-RAT, and conduct several tests to understand learned representations better. Since we teach models trained on natural language to do formal mathematics, we hypothesize that such models would benefit from training on semi-formal steps that explain how math results are derived. To better accommodate such training, we also propose new pretext tasks for learning mathematical rules. We call them (Neighbor) Reasoning Order Prediction (ROP or NROP). With this new model, we achieve significantly better outcomes than data-driven baselines and even on-par with more tailored models.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Large Language Models

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Denny Zhou
  2. Quoc V. Le
  3. Jason Wei
  4. Xuezhi Wang
  5. Ed H. Chi
  6. Wenhu Chen
  7. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  8. Mohit Bansal

In Information Systems

  1. Ryan-Rhys Griffiths
  2. Jason Wei
  3. Yoav Levine
  4. Thomas Lukasiewicz
  5. Dale Schuurmans
  6. Ed H. Chi
  7. Xuezhi Wang
  8. Quoc V. Le

In Large Language Models

  1. Denny Zhou
  2. Xuezhi Wang
  3. Jason Wei
  4. Quoc V. Le
  5. Ed H. Chi
  6. Fei Xia
  7. Yoav Levine
  8. Thomas Lukasiewicz

Citations in the corpus