Complication Rates Associated With Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacements and Upgrade Procedures: Results From the REPLACE Registry

By J. Poole, M. Gleva, Theofanie Mela, M. Chung, D. Uslan, Richard Borge, V. Gottipaty, Timothy S. Shinn, D. Dan, L. Feldman and 6 more. Circulation, 2010

691 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/579df1dc899f5f61d76be09451b8c6e890f31569

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. F. Kusumoto
2. M. Schoenfeld
3. C. Berul
4. K. Ellenbogen
5. U. Birgersdotter-Green
6. A. Krahn
7. Kristen K. Patton
8. J. Clancy

Citations in the corpus

• 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. (2017, background): “7%).(71) Similarly, in a large two-center series of new implants (n51511), generator exchange (n51034), and upgrade (n5126), pacemaker implantation and generator exchange had a similar risk ofmajor complications (1.”