Noise Prediction for Increasingly Complex Jets. Part II: Applications

By M. Shur, P. Spalart, M. Strelets. 2005

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/578d629396cd79adbba2b495deaf17fe747a28b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Oliver T. Schmidt
2. Aaron Towne
3. Tim Colonius
4. P. Jordan
5. G. Brès
6. André V. G. Cavalieri
7. V. Jaunet
8. Sanjiva K. Lele

In Computational Mechanics

1. Oliver T. Schmidt
2. Aaron Towne
3. Tim Colonius
4. P. Jordan
5. G. Brès
6. André V. G. Cavalieri
7. V. Jaunet
8. Sanjiva K. Lele

Citations in the corpus

• Unstructured Large-Eddy Simulations of Supersonic Jets (2017, background): “However, because of the computational cost of simulating high-Reynoldsnumber wall-driven turbulence, the nozzle-interior boundary layer is typically assumed to be laminar or weakly disturbed in many jet simulations [13,14,16], including the present study.”
• Importance of the nozzle-exit boundary-layer state in subsonic turbulent jets (2018, methodology): “H outflow disk, the method of ‘end-caps’ of Shur et al. (2005a) is applied for x> 25D, where the complex far-field pressures predicted from 11 FW–”
• Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation of a Controlled Propulsive Jet (2007, unknown): “[5,16,17] aiming at predicting the noise radiated from jets of airliner engines, presented a zonal hybrid RANS/LES methodology able to fairly satisfy their expectations.”