Simulating cosmic reionization: how large a volume is large enough?

By Ilian Iliev, G. Mellema, K. Ahn, P. Shapiro, Y. Mao, Ue-Li Pen. 2013

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the largest-volume (425 Mpc h(-1) = 607 Mpc on a side) full radiative transfer simulation of cosmic reionization to date. We show that there is significant additional power in density fluctuations at very large scales. We systematically investigate the effects this additional power has on the progress, duration and features of reionization and on selected reionization observables. We find that comoving volume of similar to 100 Mpc h(-1) per side is sufficient for deriving a convergent mean reionization history, but that the reionization patchiness is significantly underestimated. We use jackknife splitting to quantify the convergence of reionization properties with simulation volume. We find that sub-volumes of similar to 100 Mpc h(-1) per side or larger yield convergent reionization histories, except for the earliest times, but smaller volumes of similar to 50 Mpc h(-1) or less are not well converged at any redshift. Reionization history milestones show significant scatter between the sub-volumes, as high as Delta z similar to 1 for similar to 50 Mpc h(-1) volumes. If we only consider mean-density sub-regions the scatter decreases, but remains at Delta z similar to 0.1-0.2 for the different size sub-volumes. Consequently, many potential reionization observables like 21-cm rms, 21-cm PDF skewness and kurtosis all showgood convergence for volumes of similar to 200 Mpc h(-1), but retain considerable scatter for smaller volumes. In contrast, the three-dimensional 21-cm power spectra at large scales (k < 0.25 h Mpc(-1)) do not fully converge for any sub-volume size. These additional large-scale fluctuations significantly enhance the 21-cm fluctuations, which should improve the prospects of detection considerably, given the lower foregrounds and greater interferometer sensitivity at higher frequencies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/577c97254bf343306b7700f575421eec275effb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. John H. Wise
  5. S. Khochfar
  6. J. Devriendt
  7. Tom Abel
  8. Claudio Dalla Vecchia

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. A. Ferrara
  2. Romain Teyssier
  3. Benedetta Ciardi
  4. Tom Abel
  5. Jérémy Blaizot
  6. J. Rosdahl
  7. J. Devriendt
  8. A. Slyz

Citations in the corpus