Further Validity and Reliability Evidence for Beck Hopelessness Scale Scores in a Nonclinical Sample

By L. Steed. 2001

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/577b1b276844e3756a4871fb17e6385e27f97db0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. R. Sonderegger
2. Noleen Lynn Sonderegger
3. I. Marchetti
4. P. Barrett

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Sonderegger
2. P. Barrett
3. Noleen Lynn Sonderegger
4. I. Marchetti

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. R. Sonderegger
2. Noleen Lynn Sonderegger
3. I. Marchetti
4. P. Barrett

Citations in the corpus

• The Beck Hopelessness Scale (2016, background): “Although some researchers sought to overcome this problem by converting the item format into Likert-scales (Steed, 2001; Iliceto & Fino, 2014) this strategy alters the meaning of participants’ responses and reduces comparability with other studies.”
• Evaluation of an Anxiety-prevention and Positive-coping Program (FRIENDS) for Children and Adolescents of Non-English-speaking Background (2001, methodology): “, Tanaka, Sakamoto, Ono, Fujihara, & Kitamura, 1998; Vinas & Domenech, 1998) and are psychometrically valid (Steed, 2001; Kazdin, Rodgers, & Colbus, 1986).”
• Hopelessness: A Network Analysis (2018, methodology): “It is worth mentioning that the use of polytomous items for the BHS has been subsequently adopted in several studies (Iliceto & Fino, 2015; Marshall et al., 1992; Steed, 2001).”