Optical Star Formation Rate Indicators

By John Moustakas, Robert C. Kennicutt Jr., Christy A. Tremonti. 2005

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using integrated optical spectrophotometry for 412 star-forming galaxies at z ~ 0, and fiber-aperture spectrophotometry for 120,846 SDSS galaxies at z ~ 0.1, we investigate the Hα λ6563, Hβ λ4861, [O II] λ3727, and [O III] λ5007 nebular emission lines and the U-band luminosity as quantitative star formation rate (SFR) indicators. We demonstrate that the extinction-corrected Hα λ6563 luminosity is a reliable SFR tracer even in highly obscured star-forming galaxies. We find that variations in dust reddening dominate the systematic uncertainty in SFRs derived from the observed Hβ, [O II], and U-band luminosities, producing a factor of ~1.7, ~2.5, and ~2.1 scatter in the mean transformations, respectively. We show that [O II] depends weakly on variations in oxygen abundance over a wide range in metallicity, 12 + log(O/H) = 8.15-8.7 (Z/Z☉ = 0.28-1.0), and that in this metallicity interval galaxies occupy a narrow range in ionization parameter (-3.8 ≲ log U ≲ -2.9). We show that the scatter in [O III] λ5007 as a SFR indicator is a factor of 3-4 due to its sensitivity to metal abundance and ionization. We develop empirical SFR calibrations for Hβ and [O II] parameterized in terms of the B-band luminosity, which remove the systematic effects of reddening and metallicity and reduce the SFR scatter to ±40% and ±90%, respectively, although individual galaxies may deviate substantially from the median relations. Finally, we compare the z ~ 0 relations between blue luminosity and reddening, ionization, and [O II]/Hα ratio against measurements at z ~ 1 and find broad agreement. We emphasize, however, that optical emission-line measurements including Hα for larger samples of intermediate- and high-redshift galaxies are needed to test the applicability of our locally derived SFR calibrations to distant galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5774b09fd3816c6dc9101ea847bc8ba0fd834931

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. C. Conroy
  5. R. Somerville
  6. Volker Springel
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. D. M. Alexander

Citations in the corpus