Valid post-selection inference

By Richard A. Berk, Lawrence D. Brown, Andreas Buja, Kai Zhang, Linda H. Zhao. 2013

651 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It is common practice in statistical data analysis to perform data-driven variable selection and derive statistical inference from the resulting model. Such inference enjoys none of the guarantees that classical statistical theory provides for tests and confidence intervals when the model has been chosen a priori. We propose to produce valid ``post-selection inference'' by reducing the problem to one of simultaneous inference and hence suitably widening conventional confidence and retention intervals. Simultaneity is required for all linear functions that arise as coefficient estimates in all submodels. By purchasing ``simultaneity insurance'' for all possible submodels, the resulting post-selection inference is rendered universally valid under all possible model selection procedures. This inference is therefore generally conservative for particular selection procedures, but it is always less conservative than full Scheffe protection. Importantly it does not depend on the truth of the selected submodel, and hence it produces valid inference even in wrong models. We describe the structure of the simultaneous inference problem and give some asymptotic results.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Robert Tibshirani
  2. Stefan Wager
  3. E.J. Candes
  4. Victor Chernozhukov
  5. Jonathan E. Taylor
  6. Susan Athey
  7. Larry A. Wasserman
  8. Cynthia Rudin

Citations in the corpus