The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation
By Néstor Sepúlveda, Jesse D. Jenkins, F. D. de Sisternes, R. Lester. Joule, 2018
525 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Summary We investigate the role of firm low-carbon resources in decarbonizing power generation in combination with variable renewable resources, battery energy storage, demand flexibility, and long-distance transmission. We evaluate nearly 1,000 cases covering varying CO2 limits, technological uncertainties, and geographic differences in demand and renewable resource potential. Availability of firm low-carbon technologies, including nuclear, natural gas with carbon capture and sequestration, and bioenergy, reduces electricity costs by 10%–62% across fully decarbonized cases. Below 50 gCO2/kWh, these resources lower costs in the vast majority of cases. Additionally, as emissions limits decrease, installed capacity of several resources changes non-monotonically. This underscores the need to evaluate near-term policy and investment decisions based on contributions to long-term decarbonization rather than interim goals. Installed capacity for all resources is also strongly affected by uncertain technology parameters. This emphasizes the importance of a broad research portfolio and flexible policy support that expands rather than constrains future options.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/574594c8bdce53a5c5b1a4ed513e8e1c5ba484d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- James H. Williams
- Ben Haley
- Jeremy J. Hargreaves
- Margaret S. Torn
- Ryan A. Jones
- Gabe Kwok
- J. Farbes
Citations in the corpus
- Decreasing market value of variable renewables can be avoided by policy action (2020, unknown): “Without these removals, each technology would only rise to its particular share in the cost-optimal mix of low carbon technologies for a given CO2 policy; since this mix depends strongly on the model assumptions, and has been well studied in the literature (Verbruggen, 2008; Hamacher et al., 2013; S”
- Carbon‐Neutral Pathways for the United States (2021, background): “Moreover, fl exible consumer loads (e.g., EVs and water heaters) were cost competitive with batteries in providing peak ‐ load reduction, with 74 – 116 GW across scenarios (Sepulveda et al., 2018).”