Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population.

By R. Klein, C. Schoenborn. Healthy People 2010 statistical notes : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics, 2001

625 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/574096c162a2c6675a57836f35283e9a410c84f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. C. Fryar
2. Sung Sug Yoon
3. B. Bloom
4. J. Lucas
5. Theodore Kotchen
6. M. Carroll
7. P. Barnes
8. Tainya C. Clarke

In General Health Professions

1. C. Fryar
2. Sung Sug Yoon
3. B. Bloom
4. J. Lucas
5. Theodore Kotchen
6. M. Carroll
7. P. Barnes
8. Tainya C. Clarke

Citations in the corpus

• Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2012. (2014, methodology): “Age-adjusted percentages also permit comparison among various sociodemographic subgroups that may have different age structures (9,10).”
• Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016. (2017, methodology): “Census population using the direct method and age groups 18–39, 40–59, and 60 and over (9).”
• Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the life span: findings from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. (2001, methodology): “Because illicit drug use is inversely associated with age (a secular trend), we adjusted the prevalence of ever using illicit drugs to the age distribution of the US population by using 2000 census population figures (using the direct method).(40) The adjusted prevalence is substantially higher, 25.”
• Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012. (2013, neutral): “census projected population for age groups 18–39, 40–59, and 60 and over (11).”
• Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the U.S. (2005, neutral): “population aged 20 years in the year 2000 was performed (9).”
• VITAL and HEALTH STATISTICS (2001, neutral): “Such percentages are designed to be used as relative indexes, permitting comparison among various sociodemographic subgroups that may have different age or age-sex structures (19,20).”
• The health and health care of US prisoners: results of a nationwide survey. (2009, methodology): “We performed direct age standardization via published techniques.(12)”
• Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011-2014. (2015, methodology): “census population using the direct method and age groups 18–39, 40–59, and 60 and over (9).”
• Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. (2008, positive): “Census Bureau as the standard population (18,19).”
• Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000. (2003, methodology): “Age adjustment and population estimates were calculated using the standard 2000 US population estimates, with a population breakdown by 10-year increments.(25) The following age groups were used in this analysis in accordance with the 1999-2000 survey’s analytic guidelines: 18-39 years, 40-59 years,”
• Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. (2004, background): “standard population age 18 years and over (26,27).”
• Trends in the Use of Complementary Health Approaches Among Adults: United States, 2002–2012 (2015, methodology): “Census Bureau as the standard population (20,21).”
• The Increasing Burden of Mortality From Viral Hepatitis in the United States Between 1999 and 2007 (2012, methodology): “population in 2000 by using the direct method (16).”