Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis

By M. Leamy, V. Bird, C. Boutillier, Julie Williams, M. Slade. British Journal of Psychiatry, 2011

2,700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/574071efbb372d219ad5adfd5c55e1ffbf8bf71d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Vikram Patel

In General Health Professions

1. J. Irving
2. J. Tew
3. Vikram Patel
4. Dan J Stein
5. Katherine Albertson
6. G. Thornicroft
7. D. Best

In Social Psychology

1. Yueqin Huang
2. Pamela Y. Collins
3. J. Tew
4. Vikram Patel
5. Dan J Stein
6. G. Thornicroft
7. Laurence J. Kirmayer

Citations in the corpus

• Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending (2017, positive): “This has resonance with the CHIME model (Leamy et al. 2011) outlined above from the mental health recovery movement suggesting not only what workers should aspire to do (inspire hope and provide connections to positive groups and activities) but also about how the professional should relate to the c”
• Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the management of schizophrenia and related disorders (2016, background): “The recovery paradigm has reframed concepts of outcomes to include the subjective views of the person living with schizophrenia (Leamy et al., 2011; Slade, 2013).”
• Relational recovery: beyond individualism in the recovery approach (2017, background): “One of the most rigorous and popular attempts at synthesising the many existing conceptualisations of recovery is the CHIME framework (Leamy et al., 2011); ‘CHIME’ being the acronym for the five recovery processes in the model (i.e. connectedness, hope, identity, meaningfulness and empowerment).”
• Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative (2019, background): “Connectedness, hope, identity, meaning, and empowerment (CHIME) are considered standard domains for behavioral health recovery (Leamy et al. 2011).”
• The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. (2018, background): “86 This shared decision making shifts agency to the person, promotes a more equitable power balance and therapeutic relationship, and is empowering.”
• Recovery capital: what enables a sustainable recovery from mental health difficulties? (2013, background): “…and social identities (including dealing with the impact of stigma and discrimination); . connectedness (including both personal and family relationships and wider aspects of social inclusion); . hope and optimism about the future; and . finding meaning and purpose in life (Leamy et al., 2011).”