Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)

By Ute-Katrin Krakau, M. Liesebach, T. Aronen, M. Lelu-Walter, V. Schneck. 2013

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic and Baltic countries – a review on current and future opportunities (2016, background): “…Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 5 article id 1660 · Rytter et al. · Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic… intensive breeding, gene conservation and preparedness for future climatic changes (Danell 1993; Edvardsen et al. 2010; Ruotsalainen and Persson 2013; Westin and Haapanen 2013).”
Species mixing reduces drought susceptibility of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) – Site water supply and fertility modify the mixing effect (2020, background): “Scots pine is known to be well protected against drought due to its imbedded sto-mata and pronounced waxy layer on the epidermis (Krakau et al., 2013), although its sensitivity to increased temperatures and drought has been a cause for concern regionally (Kölling and Zimmermann, 2007; Galiano et…”