The Role of the Stratosphere in Subseasonal to Seasonal Prediction: 2. Predictability Arising From Stratosphere‐Troposphere Coupling

By D. Domeisen, A. Butler, A. Charlton-Perez, B. Ayarzagüena, M. Baldwin, E. Dunn‐Sigouin, J. C. Furtado, C. Garfinkel, P. Hitchcock, A. Karpechko and 10 more. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres, 2020

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The stratosphere can have a significant impact on winter surface weather on subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) timescales. This study evaluates the ability of current operational S2S prediction systems to capture two important links between the stratosphere and troposphere: (1) changes in probabilistic prediction skill in the extratropical stratosphere by precursors in the tropics and the extratropical troposphere and (2) changes in surface predictability in the extratropics after stratospheric weak and strong vortex events. Probabilistic skill exists for stratospheric events when including extratropical tropospheric precursors over the North Pacific and Eurasia, though only a limited set of models captures the Eurasian precursors. Tropical teleconnections such as the Madden‐Julian Oscillation, the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation, and El Niño–Southern Oscillation increase the probabilistic skill of the polar vortex strength, though these are only captured by a limited set of models. At the surface, predictability is increased over the United States, Russia, and the Middle East for weak vortex events, but not for Europe, and the change in predictability is smaller for strong vortex events for all prediction systems. Prediction systems with poorly resolved stratospheric processes represent this skill to a lesser degree. Altogether, the analyses indicate that correctly simulating stratospheric variability and stratosphere‐troposphere dynamical coupling are critical elements for skillful S2S wintertime predictions.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57208ac3f25e5612653ab0041ade40b8b283f85a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. A. Butler
  2. J. Perlwitz
  3. C. Garfinkel
  4. T. Birner
  5. D. Domeisen
  6. Gloria L. Manney
  7. A. Charlton-Perez
  8. M. Hegglin

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. A. Butler
  2. J. Perlwitz
  3. C. Garfinkel
  4. T. Birner
  5. D. Domeisen
  6. Gloria L. Manney
  7. A. Charlton-Perez
  8. M. Hegglin

Citations in the corpus