Completeness of digital accessible knowledge of the plants of Brazil and priorities for survey and inventory

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tree species of South America central savanna: endemism, marginal areas and the relationship with other biomes (2016, background): “The occurrence of a certain taxon in a location and in a given period of time is the most elemental biological information (Sousa-Baena et al. 2014), and is crucial to the study, management, and conservation of biodiversity (Boulinier et al. 1998).”
The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of Brazilian terrestrial biodiversity (2016, background): “Moreover, possibly the most pervasive documented sampling bias in biodiversity is the concentration of specimen records near access routes, such as roads and navigable rivers and major cities (Kadmon et al., 2004; Moerman & Estabrook, 2006; Boakes et al., 2010; Vale & Jenkins, 2012; Sousa-Baena et a”
Mapping ignorance: 300 years of collecting flowering plants in Africa (2016, methodology): “For this reason, we choose to present in the following paragraphs the results based on Sousa-Baena et al. (2014) and refer reader to Tables S4 & S5 for an overview of the results obtained using the other two methods.”