Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV
By Khachatryan, A. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, E. Asilar, T. Bergauer, J. Brandstetter, E. Brondolin, M. Dragicevic, J. Erö and 2,266 more. 2016
918 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Improved jet energy scale corrections, based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 inverse-femtobarns collected by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, are presented. The corrections as a function of pseudorapidity eta and transverse momentum pT are extracted from data and simulated events combining several channels and methods. They account successively for the effects of pileup, uniformity of the detector response, and residual data-simulation jet energy scale differences. Further corrections, depending on the jet flavor and distance parameter (jet size) R, are also presented. The jet energy resolution is measured in data and simulated events and is studied as a function of pileup, jet size, and jet flavor. Typical jet energy resolutions at the central rapidities are 15-20% at 30 GeV, about 10% at 100 GeV, and 5% at 1 TeV. The studies exploit events with dijet topology, as well as photon+jet, Z+jet and multijet events. Several new techniques are used to account for the various sources of jet energy scale corrections, and a full set of uncertainties, and their correlations, are provided. The final uncertainties on the jet energy scale are below 3% across the phase space considered by most analyses (pT>30 GeV and abs(eta)<5.0). In the barrel region (abs(eta)<1.3) an uncertainty below 1% for pT>30 GeV is reached, when excluding the jet flavor uncertainties, which are provided separately for different jet flavors. A new benchmark for jet energy scale determination at hadron colliders is achieved with 0.32% uncertainty for jets with pT of the order of 165-330 GeV, and abs(eta)<0.8.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5714d9afe298513d9d5c6402419fed7027f2cbad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Cms Collaboration
- The Cms Collaboration
- Atlas Collaboration
- M. Raidal
- Carlo Rovelli
- M. Xiao
- Philip C. Harris
- A. Gritsan
Citations in the corpus
- Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector (2017, methodology): “Additional corrections are applied to the observed events to account for residual differences between data and simulation [45].”
- Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at s=13$$ \sqrt{s}=13 $$ TeV (2017, methodology): “Jet energy scale corrections are derived from the simulation and confirmed with measurements examining the energy balance in dijet, multijet, γ + jet, and leptonic Z/γ + jet events [53, 54].”
- Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13$$ \sqrt{s}=13 $$ TeV (2017, methodology): “After the estimated contribution of neutral particles from additional pp interactions in the same beam crossing (pileup) is subtracted by using the average pT in the event per unit area [49], jet energies are corrected for residual nonuniformity and nonlinearity of the detector response using simula”
- Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced through vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV (2018, background): “Jet energy corrections are derived from simulation and are confirmed with in situ measurements of the energy balance in dijet, multijet, γ+jets, and leptonically decaying Z+jets events [23].”
- Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS pythia8 tunes from underlying-event measurements (2019, background): “However, the MPI contribution still has some impact because it adds an average energy offset to the event, which is then included in the jet reconstruction [54, 55].”
- Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV using the CMS detector (2019, methodology): “To reduce the effect of pileup collisions, charged PF candidates that originate from pileup vertices are removed [11] before the jet clustering.”
- Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV (2017, background): “energies are corrected for the nonlinear response of the detector [38] and to account for the expected contributions of neutral particles from pileup [35].”
- Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV (2017, methodology): “A variety of discriminating variables and algorithms used by the CMS experiment for the identification of heavy-flavour (charm and bottom) jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV have been reviewed.”
- Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV (2016, methodology): “In addition, pT- and η-dependent corrections are applied to correct for detector response effects [36].”