More Voices Than Ever? Quantifying Media Bias in Networks

By Yu-Ru Lin, James P. Bagrow, David M. J. Lazer. 2011

73 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Social media, such as blogs, are often seen as democratic entities that allow more voices to be heard than the conventional mass or elite media. Some also feel that social media exhibits a balancing force against the arguably slanted elite media. A systematic comparison between social and mainstream media is necessary but challenging due to the scale and dynamic nature of modern communication. Here we propose empirical measures to quantify the extent and dynamics of social (blog) and mainstream (news) media bias. We focus on a particular form of bias--coverage quantity--as applied to stories about the 111th US Congress. We compare observed coverage of Members of Congress against a null model of unbiased coverage, testing for biases with respect to political party, popular front runners, regions of the country, and more. Our measures suggest distinct characteristics in news and blog media. A simple generative model, in agreement with data, reveals differences in the process of coverage selection between the two media.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

  1. Alexandra Olteanu
  2. Fernando Diaz
  3. Carlos Castillo
  4. Emre Kıcıman
  5. Mounia Lalmas
  6. Chenyan Jia
  7. Soroush Vosoughi
  8. Ruibo Liu

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Alexandra Olteanu
  2. Fernando Diaz
  3. Carlos Castillo
  4. Emre Kıcıman
  5. Diego Sáez-Trumper
  6. Mounia Lalmas
  7. Chenyan Jia
  8. Soroush Vosoughi

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Alexandra Olteanu
  2. Fernando Diaz
  3. Carlos Castillo
  4. Emre Kıcıman
  5. Mounia Lalmas
  6. Chenyan Jia
  7. Soroush Vosoughi
  8. Ruibo Liu

Citations in the corpus