Trade-offs between growth and mortality and the maintenance of individual variation in growth

By Marc Mangel, J. Stamps. 2001

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5702ed236e1dd2fcea94ecd69468763899e57b29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The fast life of a dwarfed giant (2003, background): “Paedomorphosis indicates that E. falconeri grew fast, and fast-growing organisms have higher juvenile mortality, mainly because of physiological factors (Mangel and Stamps, 2001).”
An empiricist guide to animal personality variation in ecology and evolution (2014, background): “…of Exeter, Penryn, Exeter, UK 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Edited by: Claus Wedekind, University of Lausanne, Switzerland Reviewed by: Laura J. May-Collado, University of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico Gonçalo C. Cardoso, Universidade do…”
Insights for Behavioral Ecology from Behavioral Syndromes. (2008, background): “…some individual s grow fast but ris k predator ‐ induced mortality whi le othe rs play it safe by growing slowl y [but both stra tegies have equ al fitness ( Mangel and Stamps, 2001 )], then an y be havior that contribute s to the grow th–mo rtality trade ‐off will be vari able among indi viduals.”
Reduced burst speed is a cost of rapid growth in anuran tadpoles: problems of autocorrelation and inferences about growth rates (2003, background): “It makes sense that the growth processes should influence performance variables (Arendt 1997; Gotthard 2000; Mangel & Stamps 2001), and biologically it is growth rate that determines size at a given age.”
Natural selection and animal personality (2005, background): “The negative genetic correlation between boldness and docility is thus likely to act as an evolutionary constraint by preventing both traits from evolving to their independent optimum, at the same time, however, providing a partial explanation for the persistence of genetic variation in both behavio”
Behavioral Syndromes: An Integrative Overview (2004, background): “, due to differences in individual state (condition, energy reserves, size)—they can exhibit different optimal behaviors within the same environment (Houston and McNamara 1999; Clark and Mangel 2000; Mangel and Stamps 2001).”
Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) (2010, background): “Active and aggressive individuals forage more and grow at higher rates (Huntingford et al. 1990; Mangel and Stamps 2001; Höjesjö et al. 2002; Stamps 2007) and, therefore, the benefits of these behaviors may override the risks of increased boldness (Sih et al. 2003).”
Fish behavioral types and their ecological consequences (2014, unknown): “Fish often face situations in nature where there is a potential tradeoff between increased feeding rate and reduced survival (Lima 1998; Mangel and Stamps 2001).”
High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence (2010, background): “Such patterns could be genetic (Geber 1990, Mangel and Stamps 2001), but need not be (Tatar and Carey 1995, Barker 1998, Primack and Stacy 1998, Silvertown and Dodd 1999, Obeso 2002, Doblhammer and Oeppen 2003, Mair et al. 2003, Dribe 2004, Hurt et al. 2006, Metcalf et al. 2006).”
Behavioural processes affecting development: Tinbergen's fourth question comes of age (2003, background): “For instance, trade-offs between growth and mortality rates can produce situations in which individuals growing at a wide range of different rates end up with virtually the same fitness (Mangel & Stamps 2001).”