Survival of Newly Founded Businesses: A Log-Logistic Model Approach

By T. Mahmood. 2000

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Survival and Growth of New Establishments in Sweden, 1987-1995 (2004, background): “14 Instead of a decreasing hazard rate some studies find an inverted U-shaped hazard rate (see Audretsch et al., 1999; Mahmood, 2000).”
Inverted-U relationship between R&D intensity and survival : evidence on scale and complementarity effects in UK data. (2016, unknown): “Index (HI) and its square Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HI) calculated at 3-digit industry level (+ /−; −/ +) McCloughan and Stone (1998), Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman (1995), Wagner (1994) and Fernandes and Paunov (2015) Other firm-level covariates 8.”
The Effect of Industry, Region, and Time on New Business Survival – A Multi-Dimensional Analysis (2004, background): “A number of empirical analyses have found that the likelihood of failure rises during the initial few months following foundation and then, after having reached a maximum, decreases again (Audretsch and Mahmood, 1994; Brüderl and Schüssler, 1990; Mahmood, 2000; Wagner, 1994).”
An analysis of new firm survival using a hazard function (2010, background): “This is surprising given that it has important implications for policies designed to assist firm survival (for a notable exception see Mahmood (2000), who also reports that new firm hazard rates follow an inverted U pattern).”
The Economics of Entrepreneurship: What We Know and What We Don't (2005, unknown): “Applications are numerous: see, for example, [17], [145], [41], [103] and [123].”