Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves

By B. Metzger, B. Margalit, L. Sironi. Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) can arise from synchrotron maser emission at ultrarelativistic magnetized shocks, such as produced by flare ejecta from young magnetars. We combine particle-in-cell simulation results for the maser emission with the dynamics of self-similar shock deceleration, as commonly applied to gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), to explore the implications for FRBs. The upstream environment is a mildly relativistic baryon-loaded shell released following a previous flare, motivated by the high electron–ion injection rate $\dot{M} \sim 10^{19}\!-\!10^{21}$ g s−1 needed to power the persistent radio nebula coincident with the repeating burster FRB 121102 and its high rotation measure. The radio fluence peaks once the optical depth ahead of the shock to induced Compton scattering τc ≲ 3. Given intervals between major ion ejection events ΔT ∼ 105  s similar to the occurrence rate of the most powerful bursts from FRB 121102, we demonstrate the production of ∼0.1–10 GHz FRBs with isotropic radiated energies ∼1037–1040 erg and durations ∼0.1–10 ms for flare energies E ∼ 1043–1045 erg. Deceleration of the blast wave, and increasing transparency of the upstream medium, generates temporal decay of the peak frequency, similar to the observed downward frequency drift seen in FRB 121102 and FRB 180814.J0422+73. The delay ΔT ≳ 105 s between major ion-injection events needed to clear sufficiently low densities around the engine for FRB emission could explain prolonged ‘dark periods’ and clustered burst arrival times. Thermal electrons heated at the shock generate a short-lived ≲1 ms (1 s) synchrotron transient at gamma-ray (X-ray) energies, analogous to a scaled-down GRB afterglow.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56f2fe904bf767de29b0f824fc6e3d8f5d523356

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Bing Zhang
  2. B. Metzger
  3. Pawan Kumar
  4. B. Margalit
  5. E. Berger
  6. A. Beloborodov
  7. Wenbin Lu
  8. E. Nakar

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Bing Zhang
  2. E. Berger
  3. A. Beloborodov
  4. Pawan Kumar
  5. B. Margalit
  6. B. Metzger
  7. Mark Halpern
  8. Gary F. Hinshaw

Citations in the corpus