The Origins of Campaign Agendas

By J. Sides. 2006

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56e9cac8e734d5e1cdf57d932efb1ecf01dcac23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. S. Hobolt
2. P. Mortensen
3. Jae-Jae Spoon
4. C. D. Vries
5. Markus Wagner
6. Thomas M. Meyer
7. C. Green‐Pedersen
8. F. Scharpf

In Public Administration

1. C. Green‐Pedersen
2. S. Hobolt
3. Thomas M. Meyer
4. Markus Wagner
5. P. Mortensen
6. F. Scharpf

In Strategy and Management

1. S. Hobolt
2. P. Mortensen
3. Jae-Jae Spoon
4. C. D. Vries
5. Markus Wagner
6. Thomas M. Meyer
7. C. Green‐Pedersen

Citations in the corpus

• Going green: Explaining issue competition on the environment (2014, background): “…of “issue overlap” in the sense that parties engage in discussions about similar issues including issues they would rather ignore from a simple party issue ownership perspective (Damore 2004; Sigelman and Buell 2004; Kaplan et al. 2006; Sides 2006; Green-Pedersen 2007; Green and Hobolt 2008).”
• Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting (2010, background): “Several studies have documented that ‘issue trespassing’ may offer an effective campaign strategy (Sides 2006; Norpoth & Buchanan 1992).”
• Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems (2014, background): “For parties, there is therefore an incentive to talk about their owned issues so as to increase their overall salience (Iyengar 1991; Iyengar and Kinder 1987; Sides 2006).”