Artificial Morality: Top-down, Bottom-up, and Hybrid Approaches
By C. Allen, I. Šmit, Wendell Wallach. 2005
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Safety Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Iason Gabriel
- Adam Santoro
- David Raposo
- Murray Campbell
- Djallel Bouneffouf
- Matthias Scheutz
- Vincent C. Müller
- Thomas Arnold
In Information Systems and Management
In Safety Research
- Vafa Ghazavi
- Iason Gabriel
- Helen L. Brown-Liburd
- Kush R. Varshney
- Matthias Scheutz
- Vassilis Plachouras
- Vincent C. Müller
- Thomas Arnold
Citations in the corpus
- Value Alignment or Misalignment - What Will Keep Systems Accountable? (2017, background): “On the performance side, there have been ongoing questions, but few spelled-out programs, for what evaluation or testing of an autonomous system’s ethics could look like (e.g., the idea of a “moral Turing Test” (Allen, Smit, and Wallach 2005; Arnold and Scheutz 2016)).”
- Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics (2020, background): “The earlier authors (Allen, Smit, and Wallach 2005; Moor 2006) propose several ways to achieve explicit ethical agents, via programming it in (operational morality), via ‘developing’ the ethics itself (functional morality) and finally full-blown morality with full intelligence and sentience.”
- The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety (2021, background): “The relevant ethical principles could derive from religious ideals, moral codes, culturally endorsed values, or philosophical systems (Allen et al 2005, 150).”
- The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing (2020, background): “With this backdrop, ethics researchers have sought the best approach for identifying the ethical risks surrounding emerging technology during their introductory phase (Allen et al. 2005; Wright 2011; Brey 2012; Stahl et al. 2017).”
- Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges (2023, neutral): “However, it lacks a concept of human values, common sense, or ethics (Allen et al., 2005; Han et al., 2022), and thus may perform its tasks or influence decisions from a basis that is not human-oriented or may cause direct harms.”
- Symbolic Behaviour in Artificial Intelligence (2021, background): “[61] Colin Allen, Iva Smit, and Wendell Wallach.”
- Ethical by Design: Ethics Best Practices for Natural Language Processing (2017, background): “There is a body of work within philosophy on information ethics (Allen et al., 2005; Bynum, 2008); big data has created its own challenges, which are begin-2 ning to be discussed.”
- Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence (2017, background): “An example of this appears above in the quote ‘‘[Bottom–up ethics] attempts to train or evolve agents whose behavior emulates morally praiseworthy human behavior’’ (Allen et al. 2005: 149; emphasis added).”
- Interpretable Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning through Policy Orchestration (2018, methodology): “A popular technique is called the bottom-up approach, i.e., teaching a machine what is right and wrong by example (Allen, Smit, and Wallach 2005).”