Metrics for text entry research: an evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric

By R. William Soukoreff, I. Mackenzie. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003

467 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56da263cd00486c3c86d0b943bd98170073f07ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Eve E. Hoggan
2. Jody Johnston
3. Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii
4. for Evaluating
5. Text Entry
6. Stephen Anthony Brewster
7. I. Mackenzie

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Eve E. Hoggan
2. Jody Johnston
3. Stephen Anthony Brewster
4. Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii
5. for Evaluating
6. Text Entry
7. I. Mackenzie

Citations in the corpus

• Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques (2003, methodology): “We have used the new phrase set with good results in recent studies [1, 5], and wish to share them with the community of text entry researchers via this paper.”
• Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens (2008, methodology): “The phrase set used for the text in the experiment was from MacKenzie [10] and has been used successfully in several studies [11, 17].”
• Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality (2007, methodology): “Although it is not an efficiency metric per se, participant conscientiousness is related to correction efficiency (Soukoreff & MacKenzie, 2003).”