The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units
By Rajiv D. Banker, Hsihui Chang. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006
360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56d4929e90f751c2378067dc2c927dc90a716ce8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- R. Nielsen
- Saeed Zolfaghari
- Frank Asche
- Abdullah Aldamak
- A. Guttormsen
- Andualem Begashaw
- Erkie Asmare
In Management Science and Operations Research
- R. Nielsen
- Saeed Zolfaghari
- Frank Asche
- Abdullah Aldamak
- A. Guttormsen
- Andualem Begashaw
- Erkie Asmare
Citations in the corpus
- Review of efficiency ranking methods in data envelopment analysis (2017, methodology): “Scholars debate to what extend super efficiency method should be used in data ranking but it has been proved through simulation experiments by Banker and Chang [59] that the super efficiency approach return unsatisfactory results when it is used for measuring efficiency scores of units under assessm”
- Future challenges for the maturing Norwegian salmon aquaculture industry: An analysis of total factor productivity change from 1996 to 2008 (2013, methodology): “For a more thorough evaluation on detection of outliers using the super efficiency test, see Wilson (1995), Banker and Chang (2006).”