Public subsidies for water‐conserving irrigation investments: Hydrologic, agronomic, and economic assessment

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Literature Review on Rebound Effect of Water Saving Measures and Analysis of a Spanish Case Study (2015, background): “Scheierling et al. (2006) developed an agro-economic model, concluding that subsidies to irrigation efficiency investment may increase consumptive use “if farmers can expand irrigated acreage use”.”
Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater depletion: a review (2019, background): “Quite a number of recent studies, however, indicate that these measures are either ineffective (Scheierling et al 2006) or can even increase consumptive water use (Ward and PulidoVelazquez 2008).”
Simple Myths and Basic Maths About Greening Irrigation (2014, background): “This hydrological paradox can be found for example in Jensen (2007), Rodríguez-Díaz et al. (2012), Scheierling et al. (2006) and Ward and Pulido-Velazquez (2008).”
Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use (2008, background): “(20) as well similar findings published by Huffaker (35), Huffaker and Whittlesey (19), and Ahmad et al.”