Composition and diversity of bird communities in Swedish farmland–forest mosaic landscapes

By Åke Berg. 2002

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56b05deec13a160d878f29511029ec228152af80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. J. Bengtsson

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Bengtsson
2. T. Tscharntke
3. P. Batáry
4. D. Letourneau
5. S. Bothwell

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Bengtsson
2. T. Tscharntke
3. P. Batáry
4. D. Letourneau
5. S. Bothwell

Citations in the corpus

• The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure (2007, unknown): “Several authors have demonstrated that forest fragmentation can favour woodland birds because of positive edge effects (Sisk et al., 1997; Berg, 2002; Herrando & Brotons, 2002) or habitat compensation between patches (Norton et al., 2000; Lindenmayer et al., 2002).”
• The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta‐analysis (2005, background): “2002) Landscape structure and heterogeneity also contributes to biodiversity in agricultural areas (Marino & Landis 1996; Fahrig & Jonsen 1998; Krebs et al . 1999; Weibull, Bengtsson & Nohlgren 2000; Berg 2002; Steffan-Dewenter et al . 2002; Benton, Vickery & Wilson 2003; Dauber et al . 2003).”